知识同步与已编辑内容并存核对：源资料更新，不等已标编辑的响应被同步覆盖或仍然正确 / Check edited-response coexistence after knowledge sync: retention is not current correctness

先区分源内容、自动片段与标记编辑的行

当前实现用edited字段区分删除查询对象，并非按一句话是否正确来判断保留。买方要先核哪些对象参与同步、哪些另有编辑标记及合法适用范围，不能凭同名条目当作同一份资料。字段本身不证明真人做过哪些判断，也不授予披露和修改权；公开预检只用合成类别，不读真实知识、人员与编辑记录，不创建费用、账号和第三方授权。

Separate the document and response objects: The inspected implementation uses an edited field to scope a deletion query; it does not determine which sentence is correct. Identify the source, generated responses and edited-marked rows before evaluating their current use. Identical names do not establish identical versions. A marker alone does not identify a human reviewer, decision or permitted disclosure. Use synthetic categories only. These examples do not read private knowledge or personnel records, create accounts, incur new spending or authorize another service.

六项并存对象与适用判断

Six checks distinguish generated and edited-marked material without promising conflict handling or live consistency.

新源生成与旧编辑保留分别核

当前删除查询限定edited为false，随后按输入生成新片段；因此不能从文档同步完成推定所有关联响应都被新内容覆盖。标记的来源、实际行状态和现场结果仍需合法证据，不直接修改标记来验证。源码描述只覆盖当前看到的基础路径，不证明所有扩展与生产行为一致；本方法不执行同步、恢复和真实字段写入，也不把代码存在当完整运行验收。

New chunks and retained edits: The deletion query selects edited=false and the path then generates chunks from the input. A completed document sync therefore cannot prove that every associated response was replaced. Marker provenance, actual records and live outcomes still require lawful evidence. Do not alter a marker merely to test deletion. The observed base path does not prove every extension or deployed behavior. These examples do not run sync or recovery, write live fields or treat code presence as operational acceptance.

保留、审核与当前采纳不是一个结论

保留不等当前正确，编辑标记也不认证作者、审批角色或允许用途。旧修订可能仍有价值，也可能与新源范围、条件和否定不一致，应由有权角色分别核依据。不能因为新文本更长或旧文有编辑标记就自动选择，更不能让AI补一份未发生的审核。需要专业决定时沿原门，本方法不作客户政策、费用、责任和实际回答承诺。

Retention is not approval: Retained does not mean currently correct. An edit marker does not authenticate an author, reviewer or allowed purpose. Earlier changes may remain useful or conflict with new scope, conditions or negation. An authorized owner must examine their basis. Neither a longer new text nor an edit marker automatically selects the answer. Do not generate a review that never occurred. Policy, financial and responsibility decisions remain with the authorized role, not this method.

发现差异先保留证据，不假定自动协调

当前所读删除与生成路径不能单独证明有语义冲突检测、重复合并或自动优先级治理；不能据此断言全系统不存在其他机制，需方案另核。获准合成对照只说明已覆盖内容，不是真实知识、安全或模型质量验收。真实撤下、改写、费用与资料披露有独立原门，不用换身份、跳过审核或直接清库消除表面冲突，本方法不改生产系统。

Preserve differences before deciding: The inspected deletion and generation logic alone does not establish semantic conflict detection, duplicate merging or priority governance. Equally, it cannot prove that no other mechanism exists elsewhere. Confirm the applicable implementation and service. Approved synthetic comparisons cover only their selected content, not real knowledge quality, safety or model performance. Changing, withdrawing or disclosing actual material needs its original authority. Do not switch identities or clear live data to hide a disagreement.

源变动后的维护责任不可被状态吞掉

把新输入、已标编辑内容和既有回答的未覆盖部分分别交给维护人，不以同步完成、归档或没有错误让旧内容自动获得适用性。后续新批准也不追认旧输出；修正一行不证明所有渠道、会话和下游副本都已处理。真实验证仍需当前范围与许可，本方法不生成真实客户消息，也不给全量一致、立即失效或统一修复时限保证。

Keep maintenance responsibility explicit: Track exclusions affecting new input, edited-marked responses and earlier answers separately. A completed sync, archive state or absence of errors does not grant continued applicability to older content. A later approval does not validate earlier output retroactively, and changing one row does not prove every channel or downstream copy was corrected. Preserve a responsible owner. These examples do not send customer test messages or promise universal consistency, immediate invalidation or a fixed remediation deadline.

并存适用卡怎样支持逐项采纳

可列源文档范围、新输入时点、自动生成片段、已标编辑对象、原依据、差异与有权决定。把保留原因、实际内容是否相符、允许用途和本次采纳分开，缺证就注明，不用一个edited标记填满审批链路。卡片只含合成字段，不是编辑工具、同步配置或人工审核凭证，也不授权清除、覆盖或发布任何真实内容。实际处置保留原记录与owner，不以文档清单替代权限，更不为凑齐表格生成缺失事实。

The coexistence applicability record: Record the source scope, new input time, generated chunks, edited-marked objects, earlier basis, differences and authorized decision. Separate why an object was retained, whether its contents still match, its permitted purpose and current adoption. Missing review evidence is not supplied by an edited flag. This is not an editing tool, sync configuration or human review credential. Use synthetic fields only. It authorizes no deletion, replacement or publication and must not manufacture missing facts.

与版本回退、下架和人工改写的区别

依据DocumentSyncService的删除范围与生成路径组织问题；现存PDF断言不能被冒充为已编辑并存专项运行测试。此处只核两类知识对象同步后的适用，非回退、旧资料撤下或单次AI草稿改写。本文不是客户成功案例，具体能力、对象与条件以实际工作区及企业约定为准。

Evidence and adjacent tasks: These questions follow the deletion scope and generation path in DocumentSyncService. Existing PDF assertions must not be presented as executed coexistence tests. The task is applicability of two kinds of knowledge object after sync, not version rollback, withdrawal or a single draft edit. No Ruby or production tests were run for this read-only investigation. This is not a customer success case; actual object behavior and conditions require workspace-specific confirmation.

常见范围与接续问题

同步完成是否说明已标编辑响应也被新源覆盖？

不能，当前查询范围与实际对象需要分别核对。

Q: Does completed sync prove edited responses were replaced? No. Check the query scope and actual objects separately.

edited标记是否等于真人已审核且当前内容正确？

不能，它不代替身份、依据、时点与有权判断。

Q: Does edited prove human approval and current correctness? No. Identity, evidence, timing and authority require separate confirmation.

源码没显示冲突协调是否就能说生产没有此能力？

不能从单一基础路径断言全系统，应核适用方案与现场证据。

Q: Does one path lacking conflict logic prove the product lacks it? No. A base path cannot establish absence across the system or production.