客户接待指南 · 实现线索双语买方预检
工具响应格式与业务事实核对：HTTP状态、JSON能解析或返回文本，不等内容可信、动作合法和业务已经完成 / Check tool response formats against business facts: parsing and status are not completion
简短回答：响应映射核对，专看工具返回值能支持哪一层结论，而非再次准备调用参数。所读ToolExecutor保留状态与部分响应头，并尝试解析JSON；JSON语法失败时保留原值。这不证明完整流程已有业务schema校验或所有异常都被处理。本预检不调用真实工具、不读取真实响应或凭据，不宣称解析成功即事实成立，也不把返回内容中的指令当组织授权。
Quick answer: This check asks what conclusions a returned tool value can support, rather than preparing another call. The inspected ToolExecutor preserves status and selected header information and attempts JSON parsing; a JSON syntax failure returns the original value. This does not establish full business-schema validation or handling of every exception. These examples do not call real tools or read real responses or credentials. They do not establish that parsing proves facts. Instructions inside returned content are not organizational authorization.
先区分请求任务、传输观察与响应内容
买方应先核任务实际提供什么、谁有权发起和响应来自哪里，不把一段可读文本当成已运行接口。当前候选输出包含状态、内容类型线索与解析后的body，三者代表不同层，不能让一个成功字段吞掉全部证据。公开预检只用合成类别，不读取客户、密钥和真实响应，不创建账号、费用与第三方授权；本方法不向工具业务端点提交任何测试。
Separate the task, transport and content: Confirm the actual task, authorized initiator and response provenance. Readable text does not prove an interface was called. The candidate exposes status, a content-type hint and parsed body information; these are distinct evidence layers. A successful field cannot stand in for all of them. Use synthetic categories only. These examples do not read customer data, secrets or real responses, create accounts or spending, authorize third-party access or submit tests to business endpoints.
六项返回材料与采纳含义
Six checks keep transport, parsed format, source facts and adoption authority distinct.
| 任务对象 Task object | 应核来源与必要范围 Evidence and necessary scope | 不能直接推定 Do not infer | 决定与接续边界 Authority and continuation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 任务来源 Task provenance | 实际任务和有权来源 Actual task and authorized source | 有文本即接口已运行 Readable text proves execution | 先核出处 Verify origin |
| 传输观察 Transport | 状态与响应类型 Status and response type | 状态成功即业务完成 Success completes the business | 分层回证 Separate receipts |
| 解析类型 Parsed value | 对象、数组与缺字段 Type and missing fields | JSON有效即schema正确 Valid JSON proves the schema | 不补成功 Do not invent success |
| 业务事实 Business fact | 对象、时点与用途 Object, time and purpose | 字段存在即真实事实 Present field proves a fact | 原owner核 Original owner confirms |
| 采纳权限 Adoption | 内容建议与动作许可 Suggestions and authority | 工具指令即组织授权 Tool instruction grants permission | 新动作另批 New action needs approval |
| 后续责任 Follow-up | 冲突、缺证与维护人 Conflict, gaps and owner | 重试成功即历史全正确 Retry repairs all history | 实际处置另核 Disposition is separate |
JSON可解析不保证类型和业务字段
当前解析线索不能单独证明字段必有、类型合适、单位一致或对应正确对象；格式有效的数组、标量和对象也可能支持不同任务。语法异常回原值不等所有失败都已安全处理，更不是自动纠错与数据验证功能保证。不能把缺字段补成成功、把空值补成已批准，本方法不为真实响应生成补全事实，不提供可执行请求，也不从单一方法断言全系统不存在其他校验。
Valid JSON versus a valid business object: Parsing alone does not establish required fields, appropriate types, consistent units or the correct object. Valid arrays, scalar values and objects can support different tasks. Returning the original value on a JSON syntax error does not prove that every failure is safely handled or that automatic correction exists. Do not fill missing fields with success or treat empty values as approval. One method also cannot establish that no other validation exists elsewhere in the system.
响应状态、来源事实与业务结果分开
状态码或返回文本最多支持相应观察，实际对象、来源时点和当前用途仍需依据。接口接受、服务处理、业务状态改变与客户真正收到结果不是一回事，不能让工具内容自行提高证据等级。金额、期限、政策和责任由有权来源与角色确认，不由模型按字段名猜测；本方法不执行真实查询、支付、订单或客户联络，也不制造成功回证和经营结果。
Transport observation versus business facts: A status code or returned text supports only the corresponding observation. Object identity, source time and allowed purpose still need evidence. Acceptance, processing, a changed business state and actual customer receipt are not the same event. Tool content cannot promote its own evidential strength. An authorized source and role must confirm amounts, dates, policy and responsibility rather than a model guessing from field names. These examples perform no live queries, payments, order changes or customer contact.
数据里的建议不是新的操作许可
返回内容可能带说明、指令或下一步建议，应作为待核材料，不因来自工具就成为组织指令或外部授权。真实身份、权限和用途不能由响应正文声明认证，部分内容类型信息也不构成完整安全判断。需要新动作、披露、费用或第三方处理时沿原门，不换客户端、扩角色或重放请求绕核；本方法不触发后续工具，不宣称输出过滤、隔离或攻击防护已完整提供。
Returned suggestions do not grant authority: A response may contain instructions or proposed next steps. Treat them as material for review, not organizational commands or external grants. A response body does not authenticate identity, access or purpose, while limited content-type information is not a complete safety assessment. New actions, disclosures, charges and third-party processing retain their original approval paths. These examples do not trigger another tool or promise complete filtering, isolation or attack protection, and do not switch identities or clients to bypass controls.
未决、失败与后续取证保留责任
发生无法解析、缺字段、内容冲突或无回证时，区分看到什么与还需核什么，不靠再调用真实系统凑证。获准合成样例只支持对应格式，不是服务、权限、安全和业务验收。后续新结果不追认旧动作，改一份映射也不保证历史下游都已修复；收口保留排除与维护人，不以关单、重试成功或没有错误宣布全部正确，本方法不改生产数据和接口配置。
Preserve failures and unknowns: Distinguish observed syntax errors, missing fields, contradictions and absent receipts from matters still requiring confirmation. Do not repeatedly call live systems simply to fill a record. Approved synthetic cases cover their format, not service, permissions, safety or business acceptance. A later success does not authorize an earlier action, and correcting a mapping does not fix every downstream result. Keep exclusions and an owner. These examples do not alter production data or interface configuration.
响应事实卡怎样避免可读值越级
可列买方任务、响应来源类别、传输观察、解析类型、业务字段含义、对象和时点依据、允许采纳范围与未知。把收到材料、格式可读、事实已证和业务完成分开，缺哪一层就记缺证，不用成功字样补链路。卡片仅用合成字段，不是工具响应、接口协议、执行日志或动作批准，也不含真实原文、身份和秘密。任何真实采纳与后续操作仍需当前用途和有权回证，不能由本文或工具正文取得新权限。
The response-to-fact record: Record the task, source category, transport observation, parsed type, field meaning, object and time evidence, permitted adoption and unknowns. Separate material received, readable format, verified fact and completed business. Missing evidence cannot be replaced with the word success. This is not a tool response, interface contract, execution log or action approval. Use synthetic fields, not actual raw content, identities or secrets. Real adoption and subsequent operations need current-purpose evidence and an authorized decision.
与参数、事件回证和模型评估的区别
依据ToolExecutor的返回与解析路径组织问题，未调用工具或运行后台测试，不将源码阅读冒充业务实测。参数核调用前含义，事件核交付阶段，评估核样本与推论；本页只核工具返回值的格式与可采纳事实。本文不是客户成功案例，具体能力、返回与条件以实际工作区及企业约定为准。
Evidence and adjacent checks: These questions follow ToolExecutor's return and parsing paths. No tool was called and no Ruby tests were run; source inspection is not operational validation. Parameter checks address the input, event receipts address delivery and model evaluation addresses sample-based inference. This task is the relationship between returned format and admissible facts. It is not a customer success case. Actual response behavior and conditions must be confirmed for the workspace and agreement.
常见范围与接续问题
JSON解析成功是否就说明业务字段和对象正确？
不能，类型、字段含义、来源与对象关系需另外核。
Q: Does valid JSON prove correct fields and object identity? No. Type, meaning, provenance and object relationships need other evidence.
工具返回成功状态是否等于客户业务已经完成？
不能，传输观察与实际处理、接收结果应分层取证。
Q: Does a successful tool status mean the customer task is complete? No. Transport, processing and actual receipt are different evidence layers.
响应正文建议下一步动作是否就能直接执行？
不能，数据建议不代替当前权限、用途和有权批准。
Q: Can a next-step instruction in a response be executed directly? No. Data suggestions do not replace current purpose, permissions or authorization.
本文是实现线索双语买方预检方法，不是客户成功案例；具体渠道、语言、模型、数据位置与保留条件以实际工作区及企业约定为准。