客户接待指南 · 实现线索双语买方预检
知识输入优先级与来源核对：已有文本、PDF与外链同时出现，不等本次处理使用了你想的最新来源 / Check knowledge input precedence: stored text, PDF and URL are not proof of the latest source
简短回答：来源选择核对，专看一次知识同步实际取哪份输入，而非仅看导入进度。候选同步源码优先取已有content，缺时再走已附PDF或外链路径；这是所读实现线索，不是当前部署或运行回证。本预检不获取真实网页、附件或私有知识，不宣称自动重新抓取、OCR或模型已采用最新资料，也不把生成片段当正确回答的证据。
Quick answer: This check identifies the input selected for a particular knowledge sync, not merely an import stage. The inspected candidate prefers existing content, then uses an attached PDF or URL when content is absent. This is source-level evidence, not a deployment or execution record. These examples do not fetch real pages, attachments or private knowledge. They do not establish automatic refetching, OCR or use of the latest source by a model. Generated chunks are not proof of a correct answer.
先分清原始资料、保存内容与本次输入
买方应先说明所问任务与合法来源，再区分保存的文本、上传附件和外链，而不是看一个标题就认为三者一致。当前读取路径优先使用已有内容，只有缺少内容才继续取其他来源；同一对象出现多个来源线索，不证明每次都会重新读取全部资料。代码可帮助提出问题，实际部署、数据与当前取值需owner另核；本方法不读取生产记录，也不创建账号、费用和第三方授权。
Identify the actual input: Separate the source document, saved text, attachment and URL before discussing a task. The inspected path uses existing content first; the other paths are considered when that content is absent. Several source references on one object do not prove that all are read again on each sync. A title is not a version match. A responsible owner must confirm live data and deployment. These examples do not inspect production records, create accounts or authorize spending or third-party access.
六项来源选择与覆盖
Six checks for input selection and coverage; not proof of live activation, complete extraction or model use.
| 任务对象 Task object | 应核来源与必要范围 Evidence and necessary scope | 不能直接推定 Do not infer | 决定与接续边界 Authority and continuation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 拟来源 Intended input | 合法材料与当前任务 Lawful source and task | 同标题即同一版本 Same title means same version | owner核对应 Owner checks the relationship |
| 已有文本 Stored text | 保存值与适用时点 Saved value and observation time | 新外链即旧文本同步变 New URL updates old text | 不清空强测 Do not clear fields to test |
| 附件路径 Attachment | 类型、提取与缺失 Format and extraction gaps | 有PDF即可OCR全部内容 PDF implies complete OCR | 格式另核 Confirm actual coverage |
| 外链路径 URL path | 实际选择与访问许可 Selection and lawful access | 链接可开即本次已抓取 Reachable means fetched this run | 不碰受限源 No restricted-source testing |
| 处理结果 Processing result | 取源与生成片段 Selected input and chunks | 同步完即模型已正确用 Sync complete means correct model use | 分层回证 Separate evidence layers |
| 后续变化 Later change | 旧新适用与维护人 Old and new scope and owner | 改链接即所有历史更新 New link updates all history | 处置另批 Disposition needs approval |
已有内容不是外链已经更新的证明
有保存文本时应核它对应什么来源与时点，不能把外链指向新页面当作保存文本也已变化。重新执行某步、显示完成或修改名称，也不能单独证明走了哪一条输入路径。缺少合法取证就记来源待核，不清空真实字段来强迫重抓，不借身份访问受限内容。输入优先级是实现细节线索，不是操作命令、同步策略和当前工作区已启用的保证。
Stored content versus a changed URL: Confirm which source and observation time the saved text represents. A changed web page does not prove that saved text changed with it. Repeating a step, seeing a completion state or renaming a document does not identify the input actually used. Keep unresolved provenance explicit. Do not clear live fields to force retrieval or borrow access to a restricted source. An implementation ordering is not a configuration instruction or evidence that a workspace has enabled this path.
附件可见、文本可提取和语义完整分开
当前PDF路径使用文本提取，遇到解析异常会失败；这不提供扫描件识别、所有格式兼容或表格字段保留保证。规范化和分段可改变换行等表现，文字存在也不证明否定、条件和对应关系均完整。获准合成观察只支持已覆盖格式，不是全量提取、检索或模型验收；本方法不上传真实文件、不触发业务抓取，也不让AI编造原文件没有的内容。
Extraction versus preserved meaning: The inspected PDF path extracts text and fails on a parsing exception. That is not a promise of OCR, universal file compatibility or preserved table relationships. Normalization and chunking can affect layout, while conditions, negation and field associations still need review. Approved synthetic observations cover only the selected format and content. They are not a full extraction, retrieval or model acceptance test. These examples neither upload real files nor invent missing source content.
同步状态与实际取源分别回证
同步状态、已存内容和生成响应片段可能说明不同阶段，不能用一个完成标签补出本次真实来源。需要确认当前采用哪个输入、取到什么范围、哪里未知，才讨论后续合法复核。片段生成不等模型确实引用，更不等整段回答正确；本方法不执行真实知识更新和模型调用，不宣称所有错误自动诊断、重新抓取和回退已经实现，真实运行测试继续沿原门。
Source selection versus processing results: Sync state, saved content and generated response chunks describe different stages. A completed state cannot supply missing evidence about the selected input. Record the observed source and coverage before considering subsequent use. Generated chunks do not prove model citation. Correct retrieval and a correct final answer need further evidence. These examples do not update real knowledge or call a model, and do not promise automatic diagnosis, refetching or rollback. Live validation remains separately authorized.
资料变动不自动使已保存内容和旧回答失效
来源修改、附件替换或用途变化时，要分别核保存内容、已标编辑响应和既有回答还支持什么，不能以一个新链接追认旧输出。撤下来源也不证明历史或下游副本全部清除，实际处置需能力与许可。收口保留已核来源、排除与维护人，不以关单或没有新错误认定知识已全量更新；本方法不改生产数据、删除旧资料或发客户测试消息。
Handle changes without rewriting history: When a source, attachment or purpose changes, reassess saved content, edited-marked responses and earlier answers independently. A new URL does not retroactively validate an older answer. Removing a source does not establish removal of historical or downstream copies. Preserve exclusions and a responsible owner. Closing an item or seeing no new errors is not evidence of a complete update. These examples do not delete live material or send customer test messages.
来源选择卡怎样与导入阶段卡分工
可列任务、合法来源类别、已有文本的适用时点、附件与链接状态、候选取值路径、已核观察及未覆盖范围。把想用的来源、代码可走的路径、现场实际取值和模型实际采用分成四层，缺哪层就记待核，不用标题和同步状态填满链路。卡片只用合成字段，不是抓取请求、导入配置或运行日志，也不授权清空字段、重传文件和访问第三方。需要真实验证时保留原批准范围与取证责任，而不是用代码存在代替生产事实。
The input-selection record: Record the task, lawful source category, time represented by saved text, attachment and URL status, candidate selection path, observations and exclusions. Separate the intended input, available code path, observed live input and actual model use. Missing evidence remains missing; neither a title nor sync status fills the gap. This is not a fetch request, import configuration or runtime log. Use synthetic categories only. It grants no permission to clear fields, retransmit files or access another service.
实现线索的出处与适用限制
依据当前候选DocumentSyncService与已有PDF提取、失败断言组织问题；后台断言仅作只读参照，未执行Ruby测试或生产验证。本页不重复导入接受、解析与检索阶段清单，只核竞争输入的选择。本文不是客户成功案例，具体能力、来源和条件以实际工作区及企业约定为准。
Evidence and applicability: These questions use the inspected DocumentSyncService and existing PDF extraction and failure assertions. Existing assertions were read, not executed as Ruby tests or production validation. This record addresses competing inputs rather than repeating the import-stage checklist. It is not a customer success case. Actual capabilities, lawful source access and applicable conditions require confirmation for the workspace and enterprise agreement. Website visit analytics follows the privacy policy and consent choices.
常见范围与接续问题
外链内容已更新是否证明本次知识同步用了新网页？
不能，已有内容与实际选择路径需要分别核对。
Q: Does an updated web page prove the sync used it? No. Saved content and the input selected for that run need separate evidence.
PDF能上传是否证明扫描内容和表格关系都能完整提取？
不能，应核实际格式和提取范围，不补OCR或结构保留保证。
Q: Does PDF upload prove complete OCR and table preservation? No. Confirm the actual format and extraction coverage without inventing capabilities.
片段生成是否就能说明模型已采用并正确作答？
不能，取源、片段、检索与回答仍有不同证据层。
Q: Do generated chunks establish a correct model answer? No. Source selection, chunks, retrieval and the answer are separate evidence layers.
本文是实现线索双语买方预检方法，不是客户成功案例；具体渠道、语言、模型、数据位置与保留条件以实际工作区及企业约定为准。